<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Confessions of a Quote Whore</title>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:58:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.16</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Career-long collaborators share Martin Scorsese memories</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Martin Scorsese" src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/m/martin-scorsese-thumb.jpg" class="floatimgright" width="200" height="297" border="1" />Today, nobody thinks twice about film school as a path to directing, but Jay Cocks remembers a time when the very idea of teaching such a trade seemed preposterous, even risible. Back in those days, Cocks was working as a reporter for Time magazine, where his editor assigned him to look into the phenomenon, a hunt that led him to a motor-mouthed movie buff -- and recent NYU grad -- named Martin Scorsese.</p>

<p>"We immediately became friends because of the holy communion of movies," Cocks says. "I found in him someone who loved movies even more than I did and had seen even more than I had -- and I thought I'd seen a lot."</p>

<p>Scorsese's career-long editor, Thelma Schoonmaker, was similarly impressed when she met the director a few years earlier. She had responded to an ad in the paper for a six-week summer course at NYU, where Scorsese was putting the finishing touches on his first short, "What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This?"</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/career-long_collaborators_share_martin_scorsese_memories_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/career-long_collaborators_share_martin_scorsese_memories_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Special Features</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:58:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On the debt District 9 (and other &apos;09 releases) owe reality TV</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember the mockumentary genre? Classics such as <b>This Is Spinal Tap</b> and <b>A Hard Day's Night</b> seem almost quaint by comparison with the narrative tricks featured in such 2009 films as <b>The Hurt Locker</b>, <b>District 9</b>, <b>In the Loop</b> and <b>Bruno</b>, all of which use docu-style tactics to immerse us in the action -- or comedy, as the case may be.</p>

<p>Had those four films been released a decade earlier, moviegoers almost surely would have scratched their heads in confusion. What is <b>Bruno</b> exactly (or <b>Borat</b> before it), with its unique mix of scripted material and <b>Candid Camera</b>-style stunts? But the Hollywood aesthetic has changed radically in the 10 years since <b>The Blair Witch Project</b> -- a span that saw the rise of reality television, a boom in theatrical documentary attendance and the advent of YouTube -- and audiences are savvier for it.</p>

<p><img alt="Example of reality TV-style camerawork from District 9" src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/d/district9_realityTV.jpg" width="450" height="150" border="1" /><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/on_the_debt_district_9_and_other_09_releases_owe_reality_tv_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/on_the_debt_district_9_and_other_09_releases_owe_reality_tv_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Special Features</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Best of 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A rough year, you say? Maybe for your 401(k). Meanwhile, Hollywood raked it in, enjoying record box office numbers, as the indie and foreign scene (though spread between fewer companies perhaps) yielded an unprecedented number of treasures. To be honest, I can’t remember the last time I had such a hard time cutting my best-of list off at 10. Surveying my choices, I’m hard-pressed to find a common theme. In fact, if I didn’t know better, I might even wonder what kind of critic can love a G-rated Japanese-animated cartoon and Lars von Trier’s genital-mutilation opus in the same breath, or reconcile the esoteric with the popcorn populism of James Cameron’s <b>Avatar</b>. But there you have it. Of the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=40209641">274 first-run and festival films</a> I saw last year (that’s as many movies as qualified for Oscar consideration in 2009 — though not the same ones), these are by far the best: <br />
 <br />
<b>Top 10 of 2009</b></p>

<p><a name="1"><b>1. In the Loop</b><a><br />
<img src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/i/in_the_loop.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="In the Loop movie review" width="150" height="212" border="1" />This mockumentary-style political satire from British comedy savant Armando Iannucci brings the fast-talking BBC Four series <b>The Thick of It</b> inside the Beltway, as bellicose “don’t ever call me fucking English” party enforcer Malcolm Tucker (Peter Capaldi, playing the full-body equivalent of a throbbing neck vein) preys on the ego and incompetence of his fellow lawmakers to spin both nations into declaring war on an unnamed country. Applying the unfussy fly-on-the-wall approach of <b>The Office</b> to a screenplay that would’ve made Paddy Chayefsky proud, Iannucci intends merely to update <b>Yes Minister</b> for the Iraq era, but in the way that only comedy can, manages to tap into something deeper. As profound as it is profane, the whirlwind of witty barbs and bureaucratic nonsense demands to be seen twice as it poses the terrifying question, What if the principles of showbiz (where nobody knows anything) governed government?<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/best_of_2009_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/best_of_2009_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Listmania</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:56:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Worst of 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/w/where_the_wild_things_weren.jpg" class="floatimgcenter" alt="Where the Wild Things Weren't" width="455" height="150" border="0" /></p>

<p>I lied. These aren’t the worst movies of the year. More like my five biggest disappointments, movies that promised the world and delivered a fraction of their potential. To me, that’s far more upsetting than a bad movie, because they’ve squandered the opportunity, and now no one can go back and do it right. You probably won’t agree with my choices (maybe you went into <b>Where the Wild Things Are</b> expecting to be annoyed and came out enraptured — that actually happened to me with co-writer Dave Eggers’ other 2009 release, <b>Away We Go</b>), but these picks were meant to be personal. Here are five letdowns that could have been so much more:</p>

<p><b>1. Funny People</b><br />
<img src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/f/funny_people.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Funny People movie review" width="150" height="222" border="1" />Let’s face it: No one’s better than Judd Apatow at raunchy-sincere relationship comedies, and I kicked off 2009 <a href="http://www.collider.com/entertainment/reviews/article.asp/aid/10469/tcid/1">covering a day of shooting</a> on <b>Funny People</b> for Collider, so my expectations were sky-high for what looked to be Apatow’s most personal film yet. It also suggested another shot at Serious Acting from Adam Sandler (I’ve been patiently waiting for him to give us more of that <b>Punch-Drunk Love</b> mojo). The stars, as they say, were in alignment. What we got, however, was a long, rambling and deeply self-indulgent powwow between a bunch of talented comics. The characters dress and talk and slouch like us (making this what exactly, a big-budget Mumblecore movie?), but I couldn’t have felt less connected as Apatow struggled to decide whether the movie was about a young joke-writer (Seth Rogen) trying to make it or an old hand (Sandler) trying to make good.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/worst_of_2009_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/worst_of_2009_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Listmania</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:44:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Observations on 61 Years of Oscar Foreign Language Winners</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, midway through a mostly uneventful Oscar ceremony, the Academy featured a montage celebrating 50 years of Oscar foreign-language winners. It was a stunning interlude, edited by director Giuseppe Tornatore with the same care he paid the kissing montage at the end of "Cinema Paradiso" and presented without a single word of dialogue — not so much an ironic choice as one that demonstrated the common language of cinema.</p>

<p><img alt="shoeshine.jpg" src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/s/shoeshine.jpg" alt="Academy Award winner Shoeshine" align=right width="155" height="216" />I was floored. What were these films? Of the 61 winners to date (counting the eight pics honored before the category was officially introduced in 1956), I'd seen maybe 15. There were landmark films by the likes of Fellini (a four-time winner), Bergman (three), Kurosawa (two) and Truffaut (one), whose titles I knew, yet never managed to see. And what about such unfamiliar and enigmatic-sounding winners as "Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion" (1970) and "Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears" (1980)?</p>

<p>Surely this was a sign. I vowed to track down and watch every Oscar foreign-language winner (no easy feat, as many are unavailable on DVD). My project began in earnest the first week of 2009 with Vittorio De Sica's "Shoe-Shine" (1947) and proceeded in more or less chronological order at a pace of roughly a film a week for the entire year, culminating Dec. 1 with a special Academy-facilitated screening of that most elusive title, 1982's "Volver a empezar."</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/observations_on_61_years_of_oscar_foreign_language_winners_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/observations_on_61_years_of_oscar_foreign_language_winners_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Special Features</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/522003134834.gif" alt="** stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://c0209902.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/FIcF3lgigWutfe_2_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Boondock Saints II movie review" width="128" height="189" border="1" /></p>

<p>Both the cult-canonized MacManus brothers and director Troy Duffy were just getting started when vigilante tale <b>The Boondock Saints</b> debuted a decade ago. But fate (in the form of the Columbine shootings) and ego (if behind-the-scenes expose <b>Overnight</b> is to be believed) intervened, sending the movie to DVD heaven and Duffy to director jail. Now, he picks up the original's open ending in <b>The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</b>, which feels larger in scope yet sorely lacking in originality, not unlike the 10-years-on reunion special it is. The audience is there, yet the limited release suggests a homevid strategy.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941489.html">Continue reading "Boondock Saints" at Variety.com</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/boondock_saints_ii_all_saints_day_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/boondock_saints_ii_all_saints_day_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>**</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:52:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cirque du Freak: The Vampire&apos;s Assistant</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/522003134834.gif" alt="** stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://c0209902.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/FID27LIF1wkPGJ_3_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Cirque du Freak movie review" width="128" height="190" border="1" /></p>

<p>Anyone looking to kick off a teen fantasy franchise can draw several valuable lessons from the failure of Universal's <b>Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant</b>, the first (and likely the last) cinematic adaptation of the popular Brit neck-biter series. First, if you're counting on a property's built-in fan base, don't stray too far from the source. Second, make sure the opening entry stands alone; there's no point wasting energy to set up sequels that'll never happen. Finally, like brother Chris (<b>The Golden Compass</b>), director Paul Weitz seems better suited to comedy than to big-budget make-believe.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941247.html">Continue reading "Cirque du Freak" at Variety.com</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/cirque_du_freak_the_vampires_assistant_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/cirque_du_freak_the_vampires_assistant_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>**</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:05:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gentlemen Broncos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/522003134834.gif" alt="** stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://c0209902.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/FIm8bnqpocD7ou_3_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Gentlemen Broncos movie review" width="128" height="190" border="1" /></p>

<p>Napoleon Dynamite seems perfectly well-adjusted (not to mention downright charismatic) compared to homeschooled mama's boy Benjamin Purvis in <b>Gentlemen Broncos</b>, the latest oddball character portrait from one-trick helmer Jared Hess. This time, the misfit in question is an aspiring science-fiction writer easily upstaged by his idol, a pompous (but published) fantasy author, played by "Flight of the Conchords" star Jemaine Clement like the cosmic love child of Tim Curry and Orson Welles. Pic tickled its target demo at Fantastic Fest, though it's hard to imagine Fox Searchlight reaching enough geeks in theaters to come anywhere near <b>Nacho Libre</b>'s $80 million.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941243.html">Continue reading "Gentlemen Broncos" at Variety.com</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/gentlemen_broncos_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/gentlemen_broncos_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>**</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:07:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The House of the Devil</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/52200313473.gif" alt="*** stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://c0209902.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/FIwjhEBD4VrczC_3_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="The House of the Devil movie review" width="128" height="190" border="1" /></p>

<p>Call it the best '80s babysitter-in-peril movie never made. <b>The House of the Devil</b> delivers about as much as one could reasonably hope from the not-quite-alone-in-the-house category, with the bonus of authentically re-creating the low-budget look and feel of that era's classic horror entries. Still, talk about setting your sights low, as the pic seems content to polish a subpar subgenre. Nevertheless, auds seeking a stripped-down retro spine-tingler that builds to an intense climax will appreciate what director Ti West has accomplished, with strong on-demand interest for the Magnet title leading up to its Oct. 30 theatrical release.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941336.html">Continue reading "The House of the Devil" at Variety.com</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_house_of_the_devil_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_house_of_the_devil_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>***</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Human Centipede</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/522003134824.gif" alt="* 1/2 stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/h/Human_Centipede-thumb.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="The Human Centipede movie review" width="150" height="200" border="1" /></p>

<p>What has 12 legs, three heads and a single digestive tract? The disagreeable creation at the center of Tom Six's <b>The Human Centipede: First Sequence</b>, a beyond-twisted body horror experiment in which a mad surgeon, renowned for separating Siamese twins, kidnaps and conjoins three unlucky tourists mouth-to-anus for no reason other than to satisfy his own sadistic whims (and the morbid curiosity of a certain type of moviegoer). Only real payoff is seeing the monstrosity assembled, and though that will surely earn the Dutch writer-director a cult reputation on the genre circuit, "going there" does not a movie make.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_human_centipede_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_human_centipede_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>*½</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:33:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/522003134855.gif" alt="*** 1/2 stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://media.movieweb.com/teasers/o/6/b/PG4Kqa48yn5o6b_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs movie review" width="151" height="225" border="1" /></p>

<p>Tut tut, it looks like a hit for Sony Pictures Animation. Eye-popping and mouth-watering in one, <b>Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs</b> spins a 30-page children's book into a 90-minute all-you-can-laugh buffet, expanding the premise of a town where it rains ketchup and hot dogs to disaster-movie proportions. With drooling tongues in cheek, tyro helmers Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (whose only previous directing credit was cult MTV toon <b>Clone High</b>) bring a fresh, irreverent sensibility to bigscreen computer animation, using 3D projection to maximize their sky-is-falling scenario. This box office and concession-stand draw should make exhibitors very happy.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941121.html">Continue reading "Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs" at Variety.com</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/cloudy_with_a_chance_of_meatballs_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/cloudy_with_a_chance_of_meatballs_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>***½</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:50:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In the Realm of the Senses</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If you think of the Criterion Collection the way I do — as something of an ongoing film education — then <b>In the Realm of the Senses</b> is probably the first film by Japanese director Nagisa Oshima you’ll ever see. It’s certainly his most famous project, and in that respect, it’s a logical place to start. The Criterion guys have even made the introduction easier on audiences by featuring a new commentary by Japanese film scholar Donald Ritchie on both the DVD and Blu-ray editions that functions more as an overview of the director’s career than a direct essay on the film itself.</p>

<p>But as luck would have it, the release coincides with a traveling Oshima retrospective organized by James Quandt of the Cinematheque Ontario, which helps put the film in context. And a good thing, too, because <b>In the Realm of the Senses</b> is an extreme case — the story of an <i>amour fou</i> between a hotel owner and one of his maids that builds to strangulation, S&M and the most personal of keepsakes (perhaps the only art film capable of challenging Lars Von Trier’s <b>Antichrist</b> in the genital-mutilation department) — and I’d hate to imagine going through life thinking all of Oshima’s films were like that.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/in_the_realm_of_the_senses_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/in_the_realm_of_the_senses_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>DVD Reviews</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:20:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Best of 2008</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The real world did its best to bring us down this year, but the movies are still about those who dream big, as evidenced by my top three picks for 2008: Whether it’s a lovestruck robot willing to wait 700 years for his soulmate, a burned-out wrestler fighting to regain his respect or a silly Frenchman with all-but-suicidal notions of civil disobedience, such characters reminds us nothing is impossible. Of the 236 first-run and festival films I saw last year (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=40039292" target="_blank">here’s the full list</a>), the following are the ones I simply can’t live without:</p>

<p><b>Top 10 of 2008</b><br />
 <br />
<b>1. Wall-E</b><br />
<img src="http://media.movieweb.com/teasers/U/g/d/PGcqgkdhXQPUgd_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="Wall-E movie review" width="152" height="225" border="1" />There are some who refer to “the Pixar formula” as if consistency of quality were a bad thing. The way I see it, <b><a href="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/wall-e_movie_review.html">Wall-E</a></b> raises the bar for not just animation but movies in general. From the beginning, the studio rejected singing forest creatures and fairy-tale source material, always looking for new ways to tell stories. This time, director Andrew Stanton creates a staggering photoreal future — a planet overrun with trash — and finds both a love story (Pixar’s first) and hope for humanity in the rubble. The movie’s unassuming lead character, a rusty trash-compacting robot with eyes and arms and no other immediately relatable features, evokes the pure animation magic of Luxo Jr., the expressive lamp featured in the company’s logo. That we invest so much emotion in that little fella merely proves the extent of their talents. When Buzz Lightyear said, “To infinity and beyond,” this is no doubt the kind of constant innovation his creators had in mind.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/best_of_2008_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/best_of_2008_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Listmania</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:08:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Wrestler</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.premiere.com/assets/image/52200313493.gif" alt="**** stars"> (out of four)<img src="http://media.movieweb.com/teasers/O/h/k/PGevkhfe3QYOhk_d.jpg" class="floatimgright" alt="The Wrestler movie review" width="152" height="225" border="1" /></p>

<p>Everybody knows wrestling is fake, but those are real professionals throwing Mickey Rourke around the ring and real staples piercing skin in one particularly grisly fight.</p>

<p>Thrust into the Oscar spotlight after winning the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Fest, <b>The Wrestler</b> features one of those exceptional, born-to-play roles by Rourke, relying just as heavily on the former heartthrob's background in boxing as it does on the off-screen mileage he has endured en route to this comeback.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_wrestler_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/the_wrestler_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>****</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clint Eastwood&apos;s Imperfect World</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/images/c/Clint_Eastwood_Gran_Torino.jpg" alt="Clint Eastwood" width="450" height="300" border="1" /></p>

<p>In 1993, coming off <b>Unforgiven</b>'s Oscar win, Clint Eastwood made a little movie called <b>A Perfect World</b> in which he played a lawman who dreams of apprehending a kidnapper without firing a single shot — a far cry from the director's trigger-happy <b>Dirty Harry</b> days.</p>

<p>But that perfect world, Eastwood would probably be the first to tell you, simply doesn't exist (as was the unfortunate case in the titular film). Where Eastwood lives, laws have their limits, rules are seldom adequate and justice tends to be subjective. But the notion that forgiveness, for the first time in his career, wasn't entirely out of the question marked a significant change for Eastwood (just think how different <b>Million Dollar Baby</b> might be if his character spent the rest of the movie getting even).<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/clint_eastwoods_imperfect_world_movie_review.html</link>
<guid>http://www.movietrailertrash.com/reviews/peter_debruge/clint_eastwoods_imperfect_world_movie_review.html</guid>
<category>Special Features</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>